Nets Skip Judge Finding Loudoun Rapist Guilty, AP Claims ‘Murky Case’

Nets Skip Judge Finding Loudoun Rapist Guilty, AP Claims ‘Murky Case’

On Monday in Virginia Smith Family Announcement the Loudoun County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court had found the “gender-fluid” boy who raped their daughter in a girl’s bathroom guilty. The second case of rape was now in the courts. Liberal broadcast networks maintained their complete blackout, even including that by the liberal school board. Before the story broke, however, the Associated Press attempted and failed to discredit the validity of this case.


Instead of reporting on the case many radical leftists claimed wasn’t real (including Barack Obama) ABC’s World News Tonight, CBS Evening NewsPlease see the following: NBC Nightly News all hyped how Washington Democrats were possibly close to a deal on President Biden’s massive spending agenda. Facebook was also under scrutiny and NBC went on about the Sudan military coup.


The Daily Wire is the media outlet that broke the original cover-up story. It’s all thereThese are the latest developments. “A Virginia court ruled Monday that there is enough evidence to find that a teen accused of sexually assaulting a fellow student in a Loudoun County high school bathroom in May ‘engaged in non-consensual sex,’” reported Emily Zanotti.


Adding: “The teen appeared in court Monday on two separate cases: one involving a female student at Stone Bridge High School and a different incident in a classroom at Broad Run High School, both in the Loudoun County school district. The teen, who reportedly identifies as ‘gender fluid’ is alleged to have assaulted Scott Smith’s daughter in a girl’s restroom at Stone Bridge while wearing a skirt. Despite indications that he had committed a serious crime, the boy was transferred.”

Fox News Channel also aired this ruling. “Meantime, a judge in Loudoun County, Virginia ruled in the case of a male student accused of raping a female student in a Stone Bridge High School restroom in late May, that’s according to the attorneys representing the victim’s family,” announced anchor Bret Baier.


Baier pointed out to viewers that they should have a copy of the decision and when sentencing would be held after viewing it. The attempted covering-upBy the school board


The case was headlined when the boy’s father mentioned the assault during a heated meeting of the school board. According to the superintendent, there was no record in his office of any such assault. Later, he said that the question was misinterpreted and apologized.


The Associated Press was also available earlier in the morning. Publication of a workGlenn Youngkin, Republican Virginia’s gubernatorial Candidate was attacked for discussing the case during the campaign trail. He suggested that it was a fabrication.


“In a speech in Northern Virginia’s suburbs last week, the Republican candidate for governor highlighted The murky situationA student was accused of sexual crimes at two schools in the area. He said the incidents, which have sparked community outrage, are the result of failed Democratic leadership,” wrote Steve Peoples, Sarah Rankin, and Will Weissert.


And they clutched their pearls over how “Youngkin’s dark messageThis represents a fresh front in the months-long [sic] push to repair the Republican Party’s standing in the suburbs…”


This continued blackout of the Loudoun County “gender-fluid” rape cases from the broadcast networks was made possible because of lucrative sponsorships from You can be sureABC GEICOCBS News, Liberty Mutual NBC. You can find their contact information linked to let you know about biased news that they finance.


Below is the transcript. Click “expand to read:



Fox News Channel’s Special Report
October 25, 2021
Eastern, 6:13:05


BRET BAIER: Meantime, a judge in Loudoun County, Virginia ruled in the case of a male student accused of raping a female student in a Stone Bridge High School restroom in late May, that’s according to the attorneys representing the victim’s family. According to them, the judge found that the victim engaged in unconsensual sexual activity. Next month will see sentencing.


The case was headlined when the boy’s father mentioned the incident during heated meetings of the school board. According to the superintendent, there was no record in his office of any such assault. He later admitted to having misunderstood his question, and he apologized.