Benedict Cumberbatch Claps Back At Sam Elliot Over ‘The Power Of The Dog’ Criticism

Actor Benedict Cumberbatch is firing back at Sam Elliot.

Cumberbatch stars in “The Power of the Dog,” which was written and directed by Jane Campion. The film has received many positive reviews from fans and critics and received a dozen Academy Award nominations.

However, the movie failed to impress Elliot, who called the movie a “piece of s—.”

Sam Elliot Criticizes ‘The Power Of The Dog’, Calls It A ‘Piece Of S—’

The renowned Western actor spoke his mind on a recent episode of the WTF With Marc Maron podcast. When host Marc Maron asked if he saw the film, Elliot didn’t hold back.

Elliott replied, “You wanna talk about that piece of s–t?” He then mentioned a Los Angeles Times article that “talked about ‘the evisceration of the American myth.’”

“I thought, What the f—? What the f—? This is the guy that’s done Westerns forever,” he said. “The evisceration of the American West, they look like, all those dancers, those guys in New York that wear bow ties and not much else? Remember them back in the day?”

Maron explained that those dancers are called Chippendales dancers. Elliott then said that he thought all of the cowboys in the movie looked like Chippendales dancers, adding, “They’re all runnin’ around in chaps and no shirts. There’s all these allusions to homosexuality throughout the f—ing movie.”

Maron replied, “Yeah, I think that’s what the movie’s about,” before mentioning that Cumberbatch’s character of Phil Burbank was meant to portray a closeted homosexual man. At that point, Elliot turned his anger on the film’s director.

Sam Elliot Says That Benedict Cumberbatch’s Movie ‘Rubbed Me The Wrong Way’

“Jane Campion’s a brilliant director, by the way,” Elliot said to start off his criticism. “I love her work, previous work. But what the f— does this woman from down there, New Zealand, know about the American West? And why in the f— does she shoot this movie in New Zealand and call it Montana and say, ‘This is the way it was?’ So that f—ing rubbed me the wrong way, pal.”

He also criticized the character’s costumes, saying, “I mean, Cumberbatch never got out of his f—ing chaps. He had two pairs of chaps—a wooly pair and a leather pair.”

“And every f—ing time he would walk in from somewhere… he never was on a horse, maybe once—he’d walk into the f—ing house, storm up the f—ing stairs, go lay in his bed in his chaps and play his banjo. It’s like, what the f—?” he went on.

He added, “Where’s the Western in this Western?… I took it f—ing personal, pal.”

The day after the interview was published, Netflix posted a screenshot from the film where Kodi Smit-McPhee’s character tells his mother, “He’s just a man. Only another man.” However, Netflix wasn’t the only one who couldn’t resist commenting on Sam Elliot’s harsh criticism.

Benedict Cumberbatch Fires Back At Sam Elliot And His ‘Very Odd Reaction’

In a recent interview, Cumberbatch took a moment to address the “very odd reaction” that Elliot had to his movie.

“I’m trying very hard not to say anything about a very odd reaction that happened the other day on a radio podcast over here,” Cumberbatch said. “Without meaning to stir over the ashes of that […] someone really took offense to – I haven’t heard it so it’s unfair for me to comment in detail on it […] to the West being portrayed in this way. And beyond that reaction, that sort of denial that anybody could have anything other than a heteronormative existence because of what they do for a living or where they’re born.”

He also clarified that the point of the film was to portray a closeted gay man. He also explained that Elliot’s criticisms may unfairly imply that those people just don’t exist in the world.

“These people still exist in our world,” Cumberbatch said. “Whether it’s on our doorstep or whether it’s down the road or whether it’s someone we meet in a bar or pub or on the sports field, there is aggression and anger and frustration and an inability to control or know who you are in that moment that causes damage to that person and, as we know, damage to those around them.”

“There’s no harm in looking at a character to get to the root causes of that,” he added. “This is a very specific case of repression, but also due to an intolerance for that true identity that Phil is that he can’t fully be. The more we look under the hood of toxic masculinity and try to discover the root causes of it, the bigger chances we have of dealing with it when it arises with our children.”